Maryam Ranjbar; saeid Hassanzadeh; Aliakbar Arjmandniya
Abstract
Aim: This study was to development and efficacy of Working Memory, Attention and Inhibition in children with executive dysfunction. Method: In this semi-experimental study(pretest-posttest with control group) design, 23 students with Executive dysfunction were selected using the non-random purposive ...
Read More
Aim: This study was to development and efficacy of Working Memory, Attention and Inhibition in children with executive dysfunction. Method: In this semi-experimental study(pretest-posttest with control group) design, 23 students with Executive dysfunction were selected using the non-random purposive sampling method and randomly divided into the experimental and control groups. In order to identify the needs and components of the Cognitive Rehabilitation Program, systematic review of the existing research was carried out and finally, based on the existing theoretical and research foundations of the computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation Program. The executive function training program was performed in 18 sessions(45 minutes) using the computerize training program in the experimental group. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function(BRIEF–P) was used to assess executive dysfunction, the HAFBAK Tests were used to assess the working memory and using the IVA-2 test for assess attention. Also, analysis of covariance was used to examine the effectiveness of intervention. Results: The results showed that after the intervention program, the improvement working memory and attention(P<0/05). Instead, no significant differences were observed in inhibition between the two groups after the intervention(P<0/05). Conclusion: Therefore, computerized cognitive rehabilitation, as a complementary therapeutic approach along with other therapies, can be used in conventional interventions to enhance executive functions.
mona asbaghi; . .; . .; . .
Volume 2, Issue 6 , December 2016, , Pages 77-90
Abstract
Introduction: The main aim of present study was to compare the effect of Neurofeedback training and Neurofeedback along with cognitive rehabilitation on ADHD children’s improvement. Method: To do so, 20 elementary students with ADHD were selected among Tehran clinics’ clients through purposive ...
Read More
Introduction: The main aim of present study was to compare the effect of Neurofeedback training and Neurofeedback along with cognitive rehabilitation on ADHD children’s improvement. Method: To do so, 20 elementary students with ADHD were selected among Tehran clinics’ clients through purposive sampling. For assessing attention, TOVA test was conducted by all subjects as continues performance test. Subjects were divided in to two groups; 10 subjects received Neurofeedback training alone and another group trained Neurofeedback along with cognitive rehabilitation. Training session were conducted for 10 weeks; each week three sessions. Data were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). Findings: The results showed that effect size of Neurofeedback along with cognitive rehabilitation was higher than Neurofeedback training alone on impulsivity problems’ reduction. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that Neurofeedback can decrease signs of ADHD and the effect of Neurofeedback can be more obvious if cognitive rehabilitation is added.
